• Home
  • About

Promega Connections

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Bacterial ‘High-Flyer’ Takes Center Stage In The Biotechnology Arena
Cell Free Expression Application: Production of Soluble Protein for Structural Analysis »

What Caused the Black Death?

October 20, 2010 by Sara Klink


This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.org
I was confident I knew a few things about the bubonic plague: It was caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, which was transmitted to humans by fleas hitching a ride on the back of traveling rats. It spread rapidly and devastated populations around the globe, and because cats, a natural predator of scurrying rodents, had been killed, rats proliferated along with their deadly, infectious cargo. However, until I read a recent PLoS ONE article, I did not realize there was still debate about whether Yersinia pestis was the infectious agent for Black Death, the disease that ravaged 14th century Europe and killed one third of its population.

To answer if Y. pestis was the causative agent of the Black Death, the epidemic that began in 1347 and remained pandemic in Europe until 1750, Haensch et al. tested teeth and bones of 76 human remains from five different mass graves in England, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands that had been dated to the 14th–17th centuries by 14C dating or archeological evidence.

DNA was isolated from dental pulp and bone samples using extensive precautions to prevent DNA contamination and false positives. Equivalent samples from skeletons not associated with epidemics were used as negative controls. PCR was used to detect the presence of pla, a Y. pestis-specific gene present on the multicopy plasmid pPst. Ten of the human remains from France, England and the Netherlands amplified the expected 148bp fragment, whereas a soil sample (to test the bacterial content) and 28 remains from the same burial locations that had no contextual signs of plague epidemics did not amplify the fragment. To eliminate PCR inhibitors as an issue, mitochondrial DNA was successfully amplified from the 28 negative controls. These ten pla-positive individuals were tested further using primers for the caf1 gene, carried on the low-copy-number Y. pestis plasmid pFra, and rpoB, a chromosomal locus. Five of the samples amplified a caf1 product; two amplified a rpoB fragment.

No samples from Germany or Italy were successfully amplified using the primer sets for the three genes. However, most of the samples were femoral bone, known to have lower quality DNA compared to dental pulp, so the researchers decided to test samples for the Y. pestis-specific F1 antigen via immunochromatography. Proteins are more resistant to degradation, and this test has been used to detect Y. pestis in other historical samples. Not only did PCR-positive samples react to the F1 antigen test, but samples that had not amplified, like the German and Italian bone samples, also tested positive.

With confirmation that the Black Death’s etiological agent was Y. pestis, the authors turned to genotyping the pandemic strains and comparing them to existing bacteria. Modern Y. pestis is divided into three biovars: Antiqua, Medievalis, and Orientalis. To decipher the Black Death strain, pla-positive remains were tested using PCR for the 93bp-deletion in glpD, characteristic of Orientalis, and a stop codon in napA, a signature of Medievalis, and the products were sequenced. The 93bp deletion was not present in seven of the nine French, Dutch and English samples that amplified, and the stop codon was absent in four of the Dutch and English samples that yielded a PCR product.

Since the Black Death strain did not fit into either modern biovar, its place on the Y. pestis phylogenetic tree was determined using 16 characteristic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that mark the major branch points. Because of the limited amount of genetic material, only nine pla-positive samples from England (2), France (1) and the Netherlands (6) were used for the SNP study. The results demonstrated that the pandemic strain not only differed from the three modern biovars but map to locations on the phylogenetic tree where the three branches (0, 1 and 2) separate. Furthermore, the French and English Y. pestis genotypes have identical SNP profiles, placing them right where the three branches split whereas the Dutch Y. pestis genotype has an additional SNP that places it where branch 1 diverges, in the lineage of Orientalis and one of the Antiqua clusters. These two related but different isolates suggest that Europe was infected by more than one Y. pestis genotype over the course of the second plague pandemic.

I was fascinated with this study of Yersinia pestis and both the bacteria’s role in causing the Black Death and its location on the phylogenetic tree. Not only could samples be taken from human remains in burial pits and the DNA amplified to determine if Y. pestis was present, but enough samples were extracted to genotype the strain. While no one enjoys discussing the bubonic plague, our modern treatment methods insulate us from much of the horror experienced by the global population in last thousand years from the three pandemic waves of Y. pestis. And I will make sure to keep my cat healthy—just in case.

Reference
ResearchBlogging.org
Haensch S, Bianucci R, Signoli M, Rajerison M, Schultz M, Kacki S, Vermunt M, Weston DA, Hurst D, Achtman M, Carniel E, and Bramanti B (2010). Distinct Clones of Yersinia pestis Caused the Black Death. PLoS pathogens, 6 (10) PMID: 20949072

Share this:

  • Google +1
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Bacteria, viruses, fungi and other microorganisms, In the scientific literature | Tagged ancient dna, black death, bubonic plague, epidemic, etiology, pandemic, yersinia pestis | 1 Comment

One Response

  1. on November 4, 2010 at 3:58 pm Ben The Brother

    Very interesting! I have always wondered this very same thing, ie; which strains of the Yersinia pestis bacterium affected Europe so much. Seriously, though… Nice summary of the PLoS ONE article, with a bit of “normal talk” at the end to get it down to my level. “phylogenetic tree… single nucleotide polymorphisms, immunochromatography… ummmmm, YEAH

    Ben



Comments are closed.

  • Share This

    Bookmark and Share
  • Awards

    Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

  • Recent Posts

    • The Buzz About Akkermansia muciniphila: It’s More Than Just Weight Loss
    • Optimizing a DNA Methylation Analysis Workflow
    • Dietary Analysis, DNA Style
  • Categories

  • RSS Promega Technical Publications

    • Novel pGL4 Reporter Vector Panel for Profiling Cellular Stress and Chemical Toxicity
    • Real-Time Cytotoxicity Analysis the Using CellTox™ Green Cytotoxicity Assay and the Tecan Infinite® 200 PRO with Gas Control Module
  • More Science Blogs

    • A Blog Around the Clock
    • Better Posters
    • Chem Knits
    • Elemental
    • Forensic Connect
    • GE • KNIT • ICS
    • Inkfish
    • Joanne Loves Science
    • Laelaps
    • Nature blogs
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science
    • Obesity Panacea
    • Only Human
    • Reconciliation Ecology
    • Reporter Gene
    • Science Seeker Aggregator
    • Scientific American Blog Network
    • Skulls in the Stars
    • The Cancer Geek
    • The Loom
    • The Node
    • The Science Essayist
    • The Tightrope Blog
    • The Why Files
    • VWXYNOT
  • Promega Links

    • Forensic Connect
    • Like Promega on Facebook
    • Promega PubHub
    • promega.com
  • Archives

  • Top Rated

  • Follow Us on Twitter

    • Hey #asm2013 attendees, visit booth #217 and see our Promega Colony Counter app in action today and tomorrow 10:45AM–4PM MDT! 13 hours ago
    • Science isn't just for the lab so consider "Easy Science Experiments You Can Do At Home", a post on our blog: ow.ly/l6y8i 2 days ago
  • Wikio RSS Feed

    http://www.wikio.com
  • Like Us on Facebook

  • Editorial Policy

    While we encourage open and honest conversation, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain offensive, obscene or profane language.
  • Copyright Statement

    © Promega Corporation, 2009–2013. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this Promega Corporation is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Promega Corporation with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. See our terms and conditions for additional information.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Customized MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 161 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: